推薦產(chǎn)品
3-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole 2-(chloromethyl)-3-methylpyridinehydrochloride 1-(2-bromo-4-methylphenyl)ethanone 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbonitrile 5,8-dichloropyrido[3,2-d]pyridazine 2-bromomalononitrile 2-(4-(bromomethyl)phenyl)benzo[d]thiazole 1-(bromomethyl)-3-methoxy-2-nitrobenzene 6-bromo-1H-[1,2,3]triazolo[4,5-b]pyridine 4-iodo-2-((trimethylsilyloxy)methyl)thiazole 6-iodoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbonitrile 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-morpholinoacetonitrile 4-chloro-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine 4-chloroisothiazole 5-bromo-6-chloro-1H-indole 7-chloro-3H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine ethyl3-(4-formylphenyl)propanoate 2,3-dibromobenzaldehyde 1-(5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-7-yl)ethanone 5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-5-one 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbaldehyde (E)-2-(3-oxoprop-1-enyl)benzaldehyde methyl4-formyl-3-nitrobenzoate 5,6-dimethoxy-2,2-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one 1-methylbicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-one 3-nitro-4-(trifluoromethoxy)benzaldehyde 2-hydroxyquinoline-6-carbaldehyde 2-nitro-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde 1-(2-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-2-one tert-butyl3-fluoro-4-oxopiperidine-1-carboxylate tert-butyl3-oxopropylcarbamate 2,2-dimethylcyclohexanone 9H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyde N,N-dimethyl-2-oxoacetamide 2-methylpent-4-yn-2-ol 3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzonitrile 4-bromo-2-tert-butylphenol 1,3-dibutoxypropan-2-ol methyl4-hydroxyquinoline-6-carboxylate methyl3-cyano-4-hydroxybenzoate 4-chloro-6-methoxyquinolin-7-ol 3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazin-7-ol 2-(2-aminothiazol-5-yl)ethanolhydrochloride (R)-ethyl2-chloropropanoate (S)-4-amino-5-(4,4-dimethylcyclohexylamino)-5-oxopentanoicacid (1s,4s)-4-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylicacid (S)-2-(tetrahydrofuran-3-yloxy)aceticacid (1S,4R)-1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-2-enol (R)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one (S)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one 化工資訊 當(dāng)前行業(yè)整體低迷的背景下，絕大多數(shù)的鈦白企業(yè)將面臨著被重組的命運。而對于如何有效實現(xiàn)行業(yè)并購重組和落后產(chǎn)能的淘汰，業(yè)內(nèi)人士認(rèn)為，必須以市場化改革為前提，允許企業(yè)自己擇善從之，提高并購重組的效率。
具體而言首先要通過市場無形之手，令市場出清，政府不要去干擾行業(yè)的自發(fā)調(diào)整。其次，要打破信息封閉，增加政策透明度，讓各類企業(yè)能夠比較自由地決策和競爭。避免“拉郎配”是在重組整合過程中的關(guān)鍵之一，優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)“強強聯(lián)手”的主旋律已經(jīng)奏響，“小企”選擇被兼并或出局的“糾結(jié)”聲在主旋律中前景堪憂。
重組并購整合鈦白粉行業(yè)大勢所趨，在重組并購整合的大潮中，“小企”陣痛前景堪憂，對于在盈虧平衡點上苦苦掙扎的小型鈦白粉企業(yè)、貿(mào)易商來說舉步維艱，首先，隨著國家環(huán)保政策的嚴(yán)厲“零容忍”;其次市場價格的下行、市場占有“陣地”逐步的縮減、先期投入過大資不抵債的囧境等不利因素，干下去眼巴巴的“愁”，不干下去又怎奈“甘心言敗”，糾結(jié)中看到了重組并購整合的“路”，兼并重組優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)，一直以來都被認(rèn)為是解決鈦白行業(yè)矛盾的一個重要措施。
全球鈦白粉產(chǎn)能集中度非常高，前七家供應(yīng)商約占全球總產(chǎn)能的60%左右，我國大約有鈦白粉生產(chǎn)企業(yè)近70家有余，大約占全球總產(chǎn)能的35%左右。據(jù)了解，我國低端產(chǎn)能嚴(yán)重過剩、高端產(chǎn)能不足。
隨著環(huán)保升級，鈦白粉行業(yè)勢必將和歐美地區(qū)一樣經(jīng)歷去產(chǎn)能化過程，催生行業(yè)升級，逐步提高氯化法比例，提升行業(yè)集中度，有話語權(quán)的龍頭企業(yè)將會逐步顯現(xiàn)。
