推薦產(chǎn)品
3-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole 2-(chloromethyl)-3-methylpyridinehydrochloride 1-(2-bromo-4-methylphenyl)ethanone 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbonitrile 5,8-dichloropyrido[3,2-d]pyridazine 2-bromomalononitrile 2-(4-(bromomethyl)phenyl)benzo[d]thiazole 1-(bromomethyl)-3-methoxy-2-nitrobenzene 6-bromo-1H-[1,2,3]triazolo[4,5-b]pyridine 4-iodo-2-((trimethylsilyloxy)methyl)thiazole 6-iodoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbonitrile 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-morpholinoacetonitrile 4-chloro-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine 4-chloroisothiazole 5-bromo-6-chloro-1H-indole 7-chloro-3H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine ethyl3-(4-formylphenyl)propanoate 2,3-dibromobenzaldehyde 1-(5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-7-yl)ethanone 5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-5-one 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbaldehyde (E)-2-(3-oxoprop-1-enyl)benzaldehyde methyl4-formyl-3-nitrobenzoate 5,6-dimethoxy-2,2-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one 1-methylbicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-one 3-nitro-4-(trifluoromethoxy)benzaldehyde 2-hydroxyquinoline-6-carbaldehyde 2-nitro-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde 1-(2-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-2-one tert-butyl3-fluoro-4-oxopiperidine-1-carboxylate tert-butyl3-oxopropylcarbamate 2,2-dimethylcyclohexanone 9H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyde N,N-dimethyl-2-oxoacetamide 2-methylpent-4-yn-2-ol 3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzonitrile 4-bromo-2-tert-butylphenol 1,3-dibutoxypropan-2-ol methyl4-hydroxyquinoline-6-carboxylate methyl3-cyano-4-hydroxybenzoate 4-chloro-6-methoxyquinolin-7-ol 3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazin-7-ol 2-(2-aminothiazol-5-yl)ethanolhydrochloride (R)-ethyl2-chloropropanoate (S)-4-amino-5-(4,4-dimethylcyclohexylamino)-5-oxopentanoicacid (1s,4s)-4-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylicacid (S)-2-(tetrahydrofuran-3-yloxy)aceticacid (1S,4R)-1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-2-enol (R)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one (S)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one 化工資訊 早在今年3月，美國(guó)因俄羅斯前特工斯克里帕利及其女兒尤利婭中毒事件向俄羅斯展開(kāi)首輪制裁。隨后，俄國(guó)家杜馬主席沃洛金曾提交了一份法律草案，要求針對(duì)美國(guó)反俄政策采取一系列回應(yīng)措施，包括停止向美國(guó)繼續(xù)提供鈦材等產(chǎn)品。當(dāng)時(shí)有輿論認(rèn)為俄羅斯停止向美出口鈦材的可能性很小，僅僅是政治上的博弈。但隨著本月8日美國(guó)對(duì)俄展開(kāi)新一輪制裁，俄羅斯對(duì)美停止出口鈦材作為報(bào)復(fù)的可能性隨之增加。
據(jù)了解，波音每年從俄羅斯進(jìn)口鈦材占其需求的40%左右。一旦俄羅斯禁止向美國(guó)出口鈦材，對(duì)波音公司的影響是顯而易見(jiàn)的。對(duì)此，波音公司高層表示，波音已經(jīng)與俄羅斯鈦業(yè)公司簽訂了采購(gòu)協(xié)議且受到法律保護(hù)，俄應(yīng)當(dāng)保證鈦材的正常供應(yīng)。波音公司高層反復(fù)聲明表明，短期內(nèi)波音公司對(duì)俄羅斯生產(chǎn)的鈦材具有較強(qiáng)的依賴性。若該供應(yīng)渠道因兩國(guó)關(guān)系僵化被切斷，短期影響或難以避免。從當(dāng)前全球供應(yīng)形勢(shì)來(lái)看，若俄羅斯不再向美提供鈦材，日本或許會(huì)成為替代者。目前日本擁有部分閑置產(chǎn)能，產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量較好，且一直向美國(guó)供應(yīng)部分鈦材。相較之下，中國(guó)擁有相關(guān)資質(zhì)的企業(yè)較少。且中美貿(mào)易摩擦懸而未決，中國(guó)的鈦材也面臨被美國(guó)加征關(guān)稅的潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。因此，對(duì)中國(guó)與日本之間進(jìn)行對(duì)比，日本更有可能成為俄羅斯的替代者。
